In the wake of editing some one year portraits of Baby Kate, I thought I'd take a break and show how the girls looked at similar ages. I guess the birthday of my baby has made me ever so nostalgic. And, shoot, everyone loves a good comparison photo, don't they?
At Three Months . . .
Say what you will . . . but they do not look that much alike to me. Sure, they look like they are related, like sisters . . . but they have so many different features. And -- again, say what you will -- but I think Meg looks like Jim and Kate looks (at least somewhat) like me.
At about 2 weeks . . .
At Three Months . . .
Six Months . . .
At One Year . . .
Say what you will . . . but they do not look that much alike to me. Sure, they look like they are related, like sisters . . . but they have so many different features. And -- again, say what you will -- but I think Meg looks like Jim and Kate looks (at least somewhat) like me.
And Good God . . . look how much I'VE changed in the past 2 years . . .
(Sniff, sniff . . . sometimes, I miss my hair a lot.)
.jpg)
4 comments:
i agree! they definitely look like sisters--not twins, but definitely related...and what little beauties they are! :-)
The girls look the most alike in their newborn shots!! Cute post!
~Erica
I think they look very much alike in the 2 week picture, but I agree, Meg looks a LOT like Jim, and Kate a LOT like you. (That's what I see in the pics at least ;-))
That was fun!
Post a Comment